![]() ![]() The eyes of those beholders were overjoyed to be experts on Hitchens’s and Lowry’s landscapes. ![]() Likewise in 2010 Lowry at Abbot Hall brought in flocks of those whose family member had lived in or near his street, Station Road, in Pendlebury: “ Dad said you’d never have guessed he was a real artist”. In 2019 the “local lad”, Ivon Hitchens, had a retrospective exhibition and it felt as if there were very few in Sussex who had not walked through the woods near Petworth where he had lived in a caravan! They bring with them local knowledge and inevitably a need to chat about it with the volunteers. Visitors really come into their own when a local artist is on show. Eye of the Beholder: Directed by Douglas Heyes. Adults often were more worried they’d trip over the stones but children loved them: the white line was “ a path”, “ a snake”, “ a long journey”, “ up hill, down, up, down”. With inspired curating, Andy Goldsworthy’s incised chalk stones have been displayed beside the mottled marble fireplace in the Georgian House’s entrance hall. Hear, hear! It’s not just beauty that’s in the eye of the beholder and every novel, poem, sonata, installation takes on a life of its own once under the public’s eye.Ĭhildren have less of a problem with abstract sculpture than their elders. This paper presents the results of quantitative experiments that establish a mapping between objective and perceived QoS in the context of Internet commerce. Taking time, the Tate tells me, is not about captions beside a work of art telling you how I should look at it but to go with my own perceptions, instincts. With the current printmaking exhibition showing more than a hundred prints, to spend 10 minutes in front of each print would take me a good 18 hours and the gallery closes at 5 p.m.! Slow-looking means being selective so I must quickly pass by works ruling them out as being too insipid (whoever chose that combination of colours?) or too confrontational (who wants to be challenged on a bad hair day?) or too complicated (looks a total mess). The same Tate website, “ Slow Looking”, suggests ten minutes is a good length of time to sit in front of a work of art. It feels quite a long time and certainly long enough to decide whether to dig deeper or move on. As I sat guarding the priceless treasure, one lone visitor entered, shot past Rembrandt’s sublime masterpiece and exited, all in one second flat, surely worth an entry in the Guinness Book of Records!īut to return to eight seconds, is it so scandalous? I have tried out eight seconds in front of a lithograph. Though initially thought to come from afar, this.Graphics: 3D graphics card compatible with Di. Eight seconds? Scandalous! Disgusting! Reprehensible! How about one second? The National Gallery had loaned Rembrandt’s self-portrait in old age to Kendal. A new evil is plaguing the city of Waterdeep, stalking the streets and preying on its citizens. Research, the Tate reports, finds visitors spend an average of eight seconds in front of a picture. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |